(post by Madhavi Ramkumar)
While
some musicians are born with it, others must at least attempt to acquire it, as otherwise the listeners are liable to find some painful experiences thrust upon them. As a music concert is both a visual and an aural experience, the demeanour of the artist on stage has a direct impact on the appreciation and enjoyment levels of the audience, and
the importance of that intangible quality known as 'stage presence' cannot be over emphasized. It is evident from the ancient
texts and treatises available to us that
the subject rightly engaged the minds of our enlightened forbears, but is often glossed over at the present time. Details like stage decor, impeccable acoustics, punctuality, adherence to specific
time limits, elimination of distractions, and so on are also not generally accorded the importance they deserve in Carnatic music recitals. This is, perhaps, a result of the unswerving faith in the greatness of the art itself, which continues to flourish even in the twenty first century, in spite of the overwhelming variety
of alternative entertainment available through the media.
It is precisely
because the art has the ability to evolve without detriment to its splendorous identity, that
one must treat it with the respect and veneration it deserves, especially
in presentation.
The Natya
Sastra, which expounds, in some detail, the attributes desirable in a musician, is proof enough that centuries ago great emphasis was laid on various aspects of a performance. According to the author, an attractive
voice, command over rhythm and a pleasing personality
are essential for a musician. A singer's
voice should possess several attributes, including audibility at a distance, lack of harshness, sweetness and uniformity of timbre in higher and lower passages. It is interesting to note that undesirable mannerisms and awkward gestures of musicians have caught the attention of theoreticians down the ages. Govinda Dikshitar's Sangeeta
Sudha, for instance, categorizes
performers according to their individual peculiarities. Among
them are 'prasari', whose ungainly movements deplete the surging tide of music, 'karali' who has a contorted face and wide open mouth, 'seetkara' whose loud intake of breath fragments his
singing, 'karabha' who cranes is neck strenuously, ‘avyakta'
who mutilates words and swara-s and produces unintelligible
sounds, and many more. Ideal settings for stage performances
have also been described in works like Silappadikaram, and
it would therefore be incorrect to presume that such notions are applicable only to Western classical arts, and that the idea
itself is an import from the West.
An
overly dramatic manner, vocal
idiosyncrasies, and a display of other unpleasant traits
on stage serve only to detract from the overall impact of the performance. On
the other hand, too stern or too disinterested an air could also alienate
the audience. An artist of the calibre and stature of
M.D. Ramanathan may get away with his own brand
of presentation, but it is disheartening
to see young musicians in the limelight, most of whom are well informed and conscious of the increasingly cosmopolitan
environment of the new millennium, paying scant attention to this
aspect. Some
prominent singers have gone on record stating
that voice culture is required only to the extent that it facilitates
expression of ideas. If expression of ideas is the major criterion, the
vocalization itself would seem redundant in some cases, as the ascent and descent
of swara-s, gamaka-s, and even the most intricate of sangati-s are etched out
in physical terms, with gesticulations and expressions to match.
Teachers
and well wishers would be doing a signal service to everyone concerned
by providing unbiased feedback to aspiring vocalists, and ensuring
that unwelcome tendencies are nipped in the bud.
This is not of course to say that a vocalist should perform with a deadpan
countenance and no physical movement whatsoever, which
would be next to impossible.
The
'bhava' inherent in the music is bound
to find expression in the body language of the musician as well. It is, however
possible to cultivate a presentable stage persona, of which a proper posture and a
straightforward manner of marking the tala may be considered the bare essentials.
Most musicians could take lessons from the matchless M.S. Subbulakshmi
who is grace and dignity personified on stage, and needs
no awkward movements and no grimaces to produce the
quality of music that she does, with equal emphasis
on both raga bhava and sahitya bhava. One may argue that one must stick
to the dictates of one's own personality and individuality,
but there is no gainsaying the fact
that a performing artist must at least strive to project
an agreeable appearance, as a mark of esteem
for the audience.
Though
the status of voice culture in Carnatic music
continues to be the subject of
an inconclusive debate, some of the top ranking artists of the younger generation definitely
require a greater stress on clarity of articulation, and on voice production, especially in the
raga alapana. The unalloyed joy that a clean 'akaara' could produce is often
marred by distortion of the vowel sound, and other lacunae in the projection of
the voice. Some great exponents of Carnatic music have, in the later stages of their career,
had difficulty taming their recalcitrant voices and aligning it to sruti. But
the crowds have still flocked to their concerts, applauding their experience
and the wealth of musical ideas they have striven to put across.
One
must conclude, then, that there is some elusive, ineffable quality in the genre
that transcends voice, surroundings and other external trappings. A mature
exposition of a raga like Todi by a seasoned artist can delight and on occasion
uplift a discerning audience, even if the voice is less than perfect. The
genius of the system is such that the use of the gamaka-s and correct values of
swara-s peculiar to the raga, and elements such as impeccable rhythm and unfettered
manodharma can weave a web of .magical beauty. Some connoisseurs go so far as to discount an outstanding voice at face value, the premise
being that the musician must certainly be lacking in other and more
important attributes. Nevertheless, a clear ringing voice,
conditioned' to the best that it can be, could add a further dimension
of appeal, take another step towards perfection, and even propel the imagination to
the highest echelons of creativity.
A resplendent
stage presence is the unmistakable hallmark of a consummate performing artist,
one who has striven earnestly to arrive at and maintain the golden mean between uncontrolled histrionics and an apparent lack of involvement. Obviously, it is the culmination of a great
deal of thought and practice, which
must be undertaken simultaneously with the musical training itself. The audience could fulfill
its responsibilities by arriving on time and remaining
seated through the performance. People walking in and out at will,
and conversing with each other, can undermine the artist's
concentration and may even prove unnerving at times.
The organizers could on their part
try and create an ambience that would elicit the very best from
the artist - a proper sound system being the very least of its components. The voice and accompaniments need to
be balanced effectively so
that each is distinctly audible without drowning the other. After all, what is presented on stage is the fruition of a lifetime of rigorous study and dedication combined with the confidence and courage to face an audience. All
the elements that go
into the making of a concert have to be meticulously attended to, making the experience a rewarding and memorable one for performer
and listener alike.
MADHAVI
RAMKUMAR
(Cartoons
by Sarathy)
Originally
published in the May 2004 issue of Sruti Magazine